Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

Following on from LibrarianMeg — and this may be the naive question:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

I read this differently from PharmacoVig_BOS, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.

PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.