🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides?

Has anyone dealt with moisture content analysis for lyophilized peptides?

zoe_NC Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 10:26 AM 31 replies 1,698 viewsPage 1 of 7
This thread is more than 7 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Oct 20, 2025 at 10:26 AM#1

Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

What I actually want to know is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

37 7Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Oct 20, 2025 at 10:44 AM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

36 6mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Oct 20, 2025 at 11:02 AM#3
DataDave said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

DataDave has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Last edited: Oct 20, 2025 at 2:02 PM
35 5DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
oliver_london
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
London, UK
Oct 20, 2025 at 11:20 AM#4
zoe_NC said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

34 4jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Oct 20, 2025 at 12:58 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.6% purity, 0.0% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

33 3robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1237

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register