🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesNNT for MACE prevention — July 2024 Page 3

NNT for MACE prevention — July 2024

gary_naperville Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:59 AM 36 replies 1,910 viewsPage 3 of 8
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Dec 19, 2024 at 12:54 AM#11
Dr.ObesityMed said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 68 years old and started this journey skeptically.

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
18 16VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Dec 19, 2024 at 5:20 AM#12
nick_newbie said:
SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

19 17hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Dec 19, 2024 at 9:46 AM#13
Dr.ObesityMed said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 68 years old and started this journey skeptically.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters. Unlike most lipid markers, Lp(a) is 90%+ genetically determined and doesn't really change with weight loss or GLP-1 therapy.

My Lp(a) has remained at 73 nmol/L across all time points. If yours is elevated (>50 nmol/L), you need additional risk mitigation strategies regardless of your GLP-1 response. Don't assume your medication is covering all cardiovascular risk factors.

20 18james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
Dec 19, 2024 at 2:12 PM#14
gary_naperville said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 54 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized. Genuinely life-changing.

21 19james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Dec 19, 2024 at 6:38 PM#15

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

Last edited: Dec 19, 2024 at 8:38 PM
22 20PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register