🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesNNT for MACE prevention — July 2024 Page 8

NNT for MACE prevention — July 2024

gary_naperville Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:59 AM 36 replies 1,910 viewsPage 8 of 8
raj_cambridge
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Cambridge, MA
Dec 29, 2024 at 9:38 PM#36

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

35 8SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tom_AK
New Member
28
112
Jan 2026
Anchorage, AK
Dec 30, 2024 at 11:56 AM#37

One thing that is still open after LipidDoc_ATL’s answer:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

Last edited: Dec 30, 2024 at 3:56 PM
36 9VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kim_atl_prep
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Atlanta, GA
Dec 31, 2024 at 2:14 AM#38
raj_cambridge said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

37 10RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
RunnerRach
Member
467
2,123
Aug 2024
Boston, MA
Dec 31, 2024 at 4:32 PM#39
raj_cambridge said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

Last edited: Dec 31, 2024 at 7:32 PM
38 11jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Jan 1, 2025 at 6:49 AM#40
raj_cambridge said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.

10 8kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1678

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register