🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see? Page 7

Has anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see?

SteveThurs Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:31 PM 36 replies 2,454 viewsPage 7 of 8
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
Mar 30, 2024 at 2:01 AM#31
Dr.GutHealth said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Coming at Dr.GutHealth’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

6 4denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Apr 2, 2024 at 11:44 PM#32

One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

Last edited: Apr 3, 2024 at 12:44 AM
7 5mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Apr 6, 2024 at 9:25 PM#33

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

8 6FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92 and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 10, 2024 at 7:03 PM#34
DataDave said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.

Last edited: Apr 10, 2024 at 9:03 PM
9 7amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MounjBrad
Member
278
890
Oct 2024
Kentucky
Apr 14, 2024 at 4:39 PM#35
DataDave said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Apr 14, 2024 at 9:39 PM
10 8marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register