🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA database project — my results so far Page 3

COA database project — my results so far

nick_SD_fit Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 6:08 AM 13 replies 2,095 viewsPage 3 of 3
KarenAZ_mom
Member
567
2,567
Aug 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Jun 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM#11
Dr.SportsMedIN said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.

Last edited: Jun 29, 2024 at 7:38 AM
40 13anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo, hans_munich and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jul 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM#12

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 15.7 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.4%
Related substances: 0.4% (single impurity at 9.3 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.6 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

41 14RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Jul 4, 2024 at 7:23 AM#13
sean_dublin said:
Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in…

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

42 15julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Jul 6, 2024 at 9:43 PM#14
nick_SD_fit said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.3% purity, 0.1% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

43 16B12Beth, RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jul 9, 2024 at 12:02 PM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.

Last edited: Jul 9, 2024 at 4:02 PM
44 17PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register