🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing?

KristenIndy Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:46 PM 40 replies 2,563 viewsPage 5 of 8
MaxMetOK
Member
312
1,123
Dec 2024
Oklahoma
Sep 16, 2024 at 3:18 PM#21
PeptideChemSF said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

Last edited: Sep 16, 2024 at 8:18 PM
46 19PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Sep 18, 2024 at 1:38 AM#22
PeptideChemSF said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$150, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$230
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$120

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

47 20PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Sep 19, 2024 at 11:58 AM#23

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

48 21mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Sep 20, 2024 at 10:17 PM#24

Following on from PeptideChemSF — and this may be the naive question:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

Last edited: Sep 21, 2024 at 12:17 AM
49 22bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
marcus_mpls
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Sep 22, 2024 at 8:35 AM#25
DoseLogDan said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Pushing back on DoseLogDan here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

50 23mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register