🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingPaid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA — looking for input Page 4

Paid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA — looking for input

LarryQC_SD Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:18 PM 16 replies 1,934 viewsPage 4 of 4
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Dec 14, 2024 at 8:41 AM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

49 22BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SteveThurs
Member
523
2,345
Sep 2024
Wisconsin
Online
Dec 15, 2024 at 3:40 PM#17

Following on from Dr.MetabolicMD — and this may be the naive question:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

Last edited: Dec 15, 2024 at 7:40 PM
50 23PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MounjBrad
Member
278
890
Oct 2024
Kentucky
Dec 16, 2024 at 10:40 PM#18
DebRD_ATL said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

1 24nick_SD_fit
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
hannah_MT
New Member
23
89
Feb 2026
Bozeman, MT
Dec 18, 2024 at 5:40 AM#19
DebRD_ATL said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Agreeing with DebRD_ATL, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

2 0PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Dec 19, 2024 at 12:41 PM#20

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed.

24 22PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register