🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingInter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024 Page 4

Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

PedsEndoPhilly Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:32 PM 52 replies 2,419 viewsPage 4 of 11
Dr.EndoIndy
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM#16

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 5 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 99.4% to 99.2%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

37 10mia_MS2, LeilaHI, marcus_mpls and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tammy_FL
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Tampa, FL
Feb 6, 2025 at 7:05 AM#17
raj_cambridge said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$125, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$225
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$125

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

38 11alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Feb 6, 2025 at 10:36 PM#18
raj_cambridge said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Last edited: Feb 7, 2025 at 4:36 AM
39 12WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
NurseLeah_Nash
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Nashville, TN
Feb 7, 2025 at 2:07 PM#19

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

40 13Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Feb 8, 2025 at 5:38 AM#20

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

12 10PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register