🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingSterility testing per USP <71> — need advice

Sterility testing per USP <71> — need advice

sarah_TO Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:02 PM 13 replies 1,420 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 12 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
sarah_TO
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Toronto, CA
May 16, 2025 at 12:02 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.

The bit I cannot resolve on my own is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.

49 19andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72 and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_manc_UK
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Manchester, UK
May 16, 2025 at 12:22 PM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

Last edited: May 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM
48 18RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
May 16, 2025 at 12:42 PM#3
pete_manc_UK said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

pete_manc_UK has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

47 17BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
JakeSmashed95
Member
412
1,890
Aug 2024
Arkansas
Online
May 16, 2025 at 1:02 PM#4
sarah_TO said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

46 16Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
EndoResFellow
Member
456
2,345
Sep 2024
Baltimore, MD
May 16, 2025 at 2:52 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$122, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$222
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$122

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

Last edited: May 16, 2025 at 4:52 PM
45 15Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register