🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — what worked for you? Page 6

Endotoxin testing methods — what worked for you?

mona_PHX Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 3:18 AM 29 replies 1,900 viewsPage 6 of 6
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Aug 30, 2025 at 10:28 PM#26

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Last edited: Aug 30, 2025 at 11:28 PM
34 7hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
amy_econ_NJ
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Princeton, NJ
Sep 7, 2025 at 8:55 AM#27

Following on from lisa_labSD — and this may be the naive question:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

35 8hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Sep 14, 2025 at 7:18 PM#28
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

36 9hans_munich, jason_sac26, chris_chi24 and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.AddMedPHL
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Sep 22, 2025 at 5:37 AM#29
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Last edited: Sep 22, 2025 at 7:37 AM
37 10TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mona_PHX
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 29, 2025 at 3:51 PM#30

Closing the loop on my own question.

Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.

Last edited: Sep 29, 2025 at 6:51 PM
9 7MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1456

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register