🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Dr.PulmRoch Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:26 AM 16 replies 1,375 viewsPage 1 of 4
This thread is more than 10 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Jul 30, 2025 at 5:26 AM#1

Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.

What would genuinely help is knowing whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

35 5rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Jul 30, 2025 at 7:54 AM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

34 4VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RunnerRach
Member
467
2,123
Aug 2024
Boston, MA
Jul 30, 2025 at 10:22 AM#3
Dr.GastroMayo said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Jul 30, 2025 at 1:22 PM
33 3Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
AmyNC_wife
Member
634
2,890
Jun 2024
North Carolina
Jul 30, 2025 at 12:50 PM#4
Dr.PulmRoch said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

32 2Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Jul 31, 2025 at 3:37 AM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.6% purity, 0.0% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

Last edited: Jul 31, 2025 at 7:37 AM
31 1roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register