🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingUnderstanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you? Page 2

Understanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you?

Dr.NateNeph Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 4:06 PM 29 replies 1,285 viewsPage 2 of 6
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Nov 12, 2025 at 8:59 AM#6
Dr.NateNeph said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Nov 12, 2025 at 10:59 AM
44 14TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TomFromTexas
Member
645
2,890
May 2024
Austin, TX
Nov 12, 2025 at 3:40 PM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

43 13Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SurgeonPGH
Senior Member
1,345
6,789
Mar 2024
Pittsburgh, PA
Nov 12, 2025 at 10:21 PM#8
labquiet_amy said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 100.5% purity
Day 14: 99.3% purity
Day 28: 98.1% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

Last edited: Nov 13, 2025 at 1:21 AM
42 12PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Nov 13, 2025 at 5:02 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

Last edited: Nov 13, 2025 at 7:02 AM
41 11B12Beth, RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
Nov 14, 2025 at 1:06 PM#10
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:
Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Nov 14, 2025 at 6:06 PM
43 18NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register