pete_manc_UK said:The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.
I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.
MariaRD said:Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:
Main peak retention time: 14.2 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 98.3%
Related substances: 0.7% (single impurity at 8.4 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.58 (matches expected molecular weight)
This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.
DataDave said:I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is.
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.3% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 10 business days.
The test costs ~$138 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from JennaRN — and this may be the naive question:
Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?
Reporting back.
Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.