🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

kim_atl_prep Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:58 PM 13 replies 1,095 viewsPage 1 of 3
kim_atl_prep
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jan 21, 2026 at 2:58 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.

What I actually want to know is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

6 1PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:03 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

5 0NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs, B12Beth and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tammy_FL
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Tampa, FL
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:08 PM#3
Dr.NateNeph said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Jan 21, 2026 at 9:08 PM
4 24kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
FranDenver
Member
267
1,123
Oct 2024
Denver, CO
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:13 PM#4
kim_atl_prep said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Last edited: Jan 21, 2026 at 9:13 PM
3 23MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.EM_Chicago
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Chicago, IL
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:40 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.7% purity, 0.1% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

Last edited: Jan 21, 2026 at 7:40 PM
2 22lisa_labSD, adam_van
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register