🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to commission independent testing — need advice

How to commission independent testing — need advice

lori_vegas Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 11:55 AM 11 replies 738 viewsPage 1 of 3
lori_vegas
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
Las Vegas, NV
Mar 5, 2026 at 11:55 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

What I am trying to establish is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

42 12amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
InsuranceTom
Senior Member
1,345
7,890
Mar 2024
Connecticut
Mar 5, 2026 at 12:34 PM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

Last edited: Mar 5, 2026 at 5:34 PM
41 11lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Mar 5, 2026 at 1:13 PM#3
InsuranceTom said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Agreeing with InsuranceTom, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Last edited: Mar 5, 2026 at 2:13 PM
40 10tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
RunnerRach
Member
467
2,123
Aug 2024
Boston, MA
Mar 5, 2026 at 1:52 PM#4
lori_vegas said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

Last edited: Mar 5, 2026 at 4:52 PM
39 9jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Mar 5, 2026 at 5:30 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$123, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$223
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$113

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

38 8KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register