🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried

mona_PHX Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:30 AM 11 replies 559 viewsPage 1 of 3
mona_PHX
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Phoenix, AZ
May 6, 2026 at 8:30 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

What I am after is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

18 13RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau, SallyK_inj and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
May 6, 2026 at 8:53 AM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

17 12pam_stl, wei_SG, cory_ATX and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BenResearch_OR
Senior Member
2,456
11,234
Dec 2023
Oregon
May 6, 2026 at 9:16 AM#3
Dr.RenalNash said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

16 11Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
RegAffairsDC
Member
678
3,456
May 2024
Washington, DC
May 6, 2026 at 9:39 AM#4
mona_PHX said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Can confirm the pattern mona_PHX describes. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

Last edited: May 6, 2026 at 11:39 AM
15 10sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
roxy_nash
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Nashville, TN
May 6, 2026 at 11:45 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 6 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.5% to 100.3%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

14 9kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register