🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingPaid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA Page 5

Paid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA

PurityPaulOR Sat, May 9, 2026 at 3:54 AM 36 replies 1,050 viewsPage 5 of 8
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
May 15, 2026 at 4:31 PM#21

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

3 1TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN, LabKate
Reply Quote Save Share Report
carl_compliance
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Raleigh, NC
May 16, 2026 at 4:46 PM#22
Dr.NutriCornell said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

4 2BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
matt_MKE
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Milwaukee, WI
May 17, 2026 at 5:00 PM#23
Dr.NutriCornell said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

Last edited: May 17, 2026 at 8:00 PM
5 3GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
KarenAZ_mom
Member
567
2,567
Aug 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
May 18, 2026 at 5:13 PM#24
Dr.NutriCornell said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.

6 4LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
May 19, 2026 at 5:26 PM#25

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

7 5bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london, tane_welly and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register