anna.melb_AU said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
anna.melb_AU said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from anna.melb_AU — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
lisa_labSD said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.