sophie_paris said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
sophie_paris said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
marco_milano said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
sophie_paris said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.