🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and arterial inflammation — March 2026 Page 4

GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — March 2026

laura_annarbor Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 3:06 AM 28 replies 1,163 viewsPage 4 of 6
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Dec 19, 2025 at 1:05 PM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

I'm 48 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

15 months later: down 62 lbs, off lisinopril, A1C from 8.4% to 5.5%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

Last edited: Dec 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
3 3FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_RVA
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Richmond, VA
Dec 19, 2025 at 3:09 PM#17
anders_CPH said:
I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 51 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized. Genuinely life-changing.

Last edited: Dec 19, 2025 at 8:09 PM
2 2Dr.Martinez, mike_mod
Reply Quote Save Share Report
dan_philly
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Dec 19, 2025 at 5:13 PM#18
anders_CPH said:
I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
Last edited: Dec 19, 2025 at 8:13 PM
1 1SkepticalSean
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Dec 19, 2025 at 7:18 PM#19

Following on from anders_CPH — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

50 0JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Dec 19, 2025 at 9:23 PM#20

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

Last edited: Dec 19, 2025 at 11:23 PM
28 3PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register