The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Following on from EndoResFellow — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
bri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsbri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Worth separating that from tirzepatide, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.
bri_stats said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.