🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesHeart failure hospitalization reduction on semaglutide — real-world data Page 3

Heart failure hospitalization reduction on semaglutide — real-world data

Dr.CardioMD Sat, May 23, 2026 at 6:53 AM 18 replies 644 viewsPage 3 of 4
BrianDallas92
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Dallas, TX
May 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM#11
Dr.EndoIndy said:
Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

35 10Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
May 25, 2026 at 12:23 AM#12

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of GLP-1 agonists and cardiovascular risk: beyond weight loss, GLP-1R activation directly suppresses NF-κB signaling, reduces NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and decreases monocyte/macrophage adhesion to endothelium[1].

Clinical correlates: hsCRP reduction of 30-60% (consistently seen across trials), reduced carotid intima-media thickness, and decreased coronary plaque inflammation on PET imaging.

These anti-inflammatory effects likely contribute to the cardiovascular benefit seen in SELECT — and may explain benefits beyond what weight loss alone would predict.

References:
[1] Hogan AE, et al. Diabetologia. 2014;57(4):781-784.
34 9KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
May 25, 2026 at 3:46 AM#13
PeptideChemSF said:
Steady state is the thing most people miss.

I will push back on the "any working dose is fine" framing. The maintenance evidence sits overwhelmingly at the top studied dose, and the extension data shows regain tracking dose reduction rather than tracking stopping. Holding low is reasonable; pretending it is evidentially equivalent is not.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Last edited: May 25, 2026 at 4:46 AM
33 8LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
josh_phd_bmore
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Baltimore, MD
May 25, 2026 at 7:09 AM#14
Dr.CardioMD said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
32 7KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC, Dr.ObesityLA and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 25, 2026 at 10:32 AM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed.

31 6PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register