🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesSOUL trial preliminary data — semaglutide in T2DM cardiovascular outcomes Page 3

SOUL trial preliminary data — semaglutide in T2DM cardiovascular outcomes

Dr.CardioMD Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:06 AM 20 replies 546 viewsPage 3 of 4
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Jun 2, 2026 at 8:06 PM#11
TrialTracker_MD said:
Steady state is the thing most people miss.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.

2 2FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Jun 3, 2026 at 11:04 AM#12

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my key markers:

Weight: consistent downtrend, -2.4 lbs/week average
Fasting glucose (finger stick): stable at 85 mg/dL
Blood pressure (home): 119/75 average
Resting heart rate: 65 bpm (down from 81)
Waist circumference: down 15 inches total

The resting heart rate improvement correlates with cardiovascular fitness gains. Everything is moving in the right direction.

1 1NurseKim_ATL
Reply Quote Save Share Report
InsuranceTom
Senior Member
1,345
7,890
Mar 2024
Connecticut
Jun 4, 2026 at 2:02 AM#13
andrew_nyc said:
Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak.

I read this differently from andrew_nyc, on substance rather than tone. The trial means are being read too generously in this thread. STEP populations were selected, supported, and titrated by protocol, and the real-world curves are consistently a few points worse. That difference is not noise, it is what happens when you remove the study infrastructure.

Last edited: Jun 4, 2026 at 7:02 AM
50 0Dr.ReproEndo, lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
dan_philly
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 4, 2026 at 4:59 PM#14
Dr.CardioMD said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
Last edited: Jun 4, 2026 at 7:59 PM
49 24Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jun 5, 2026 at 7:57 AM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Carry on.

48 23PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register