JenPlateau said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
JenPlateau said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Coming at JenPlateau’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from JenPlateau — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
kate.chem said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Pushing back on kate.chem here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.