A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
VendorMark said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Pushing back on VendorMark here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
VendorMark said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsVendorMark said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.