From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dr.EndoIndy said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Mine went the same way, slower. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.EndoIndy said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Following on from Dr.EndoIndy — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?