Vendor verification process — how to get listed

kate.chem said:

The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…

I read this differently from kate.chem, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.

kate.chem said:

The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…

Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.

Found this through search years later and it is still the best discussion of the question, so adding one thing. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

Reporting back.

Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.

Admin said:

The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.

Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.