PharmacoVig_BOS said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
lisa_labSD said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
lisa_labSD said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.