The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Following on from Dr.EndoEP — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
BiostatsBrad said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on BiostatsBrad here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsBiostatsBrad said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.