A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
nick_SD_fit said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
nick_SD_fit said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsnick_SD_fit said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.