🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionCreatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — looking for input Page 2

Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — looking for input

BethLabQueen Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:08 AM 51 replies 2,621 viewsPage 2 of 11
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Dec 17, 2024 at 8:51 PM#6
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:
There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think this board over-worries about lean mass. Some lean loss is obligatory — you need less muscle to move a smaller body, and preserving mass you no longer need is not a health outcome. The question is whether strength and function held, and mine did.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

6 1emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Dec 18, 2024 at 1:28 AM#7
BethLabQueen said:
Two DEXA scans eleven months apart: down 24kg total, of which the scan says 6kg was lean.

DEXA scan update relevant to lean mass:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass263 lbs213 lbs210 lbs
Fat mass113 lbs83 lbs45 lbs
Lean mass151 lbs150 lbs157 lbs
Body fat %40%30%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.4g/kg protein. The lean mass discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

Last edited: Dec 18, 2024 at 3:28 AM
5 0Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sean_dublin
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Dublin, IE
Dec 18, 2024 at 6:05 AM#8
Dr.NutriCornell said:
I think this board over-worries about lean mass.

Regarding lean mass: I accidentally injected my dose intramuscularly instead of subcutaneously last week (went in at wrong angle, too deep). Called my pharmacist — they said it's not dangerous but may absorb faster, potentially causing more GI effects.

Sure enough, had worse nausea that day. Lesson learned: pinch the skin properly and use the right needle length for your body composition.

4 24gary_naperville, sean_dublin, hannah_MT and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
kevin_tulsa
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Tulsa, OK
Dec 18, 2024 at 10:42 AM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?

3 23quinn_sf, NurseLeah_Nash, gary_naperville
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
Dec 19, 2024 at 8:52 AM#10

Closing the loop on my own question.

Follow-up: I dropped the cardio to two easy sessions and put the effort into three real lifting sessions. The scale slowed and the scan improved.

33 6wei_SG, cory_ATX, lori_vegas and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register