Mar 5, 2025 at 5:33 PM#51
Following on from BethLabQueen — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
8 6Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 8, 2025 at 2:40 AM#52
dan_philly said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Last edited: Mar 8, 2025 at 6:40 AM
9 7MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49 AM#53
dan_philly said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Last edited: Mar 10, 2025 at 4:49 PM
10 8MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMar 12, 2025 at 8:59 PM#54
dan_philly said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
11 9DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 15, 2025 at 6:10 AM#55
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Last edited: Mar 15, 2025 at 12:10 PM
12 10kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report