TrialTracker_MD said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Coming at Dr.RaviCardio’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.