kate.chem said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dr.CardioMD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Second this. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.CardioMD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at Dr.CardioMD’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.