5-Amino-1MQ — 12 month update

TrialTracker_MD said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

Coming at TrialTracker_MD’s question from a different direction. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

One thing that is still open after TrialTracker_MD’s answer:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

josh_phd_bmore said:

Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

josh_phd_bmore said:

Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.