🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionPowerlifting on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 2

Powerlifting on GLP-1 — my results so far

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 4:40 PM 36 replies 1,892 viewsPage 2 of 8
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Sep 11, 2025 at 1:42 AM#6
PedsEndoPhilly said:
The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate…
PedsEndoPhilly said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

43 13VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TomTeleRx
Member
189
678
Feb 2025
Delaware
Sep 11, 2025 at 5:17 AM#7

One thing that is still open after paige_pharma’s answer:

Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?

42 12bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.Martinez
Medical Advisor
3,891
28,456
Nov 2023
Boston, MA
Online
Sep 11, 2025 at 8:52 AM#8
Dr.GutHealth said:
PedsEndoPhilly said: ...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

Bone density monitoring on lean mass: DEXA bone density at baseline and month 12.

Lumbar spine T-score: -0.10 → -0.6 (stable to slightly improved)
Femoral neck T-score: -0.9 → -0.7 (stable)

No significant bone loss despite 62 lbs of weight loss. Key factors: adequate calcium (1200mg/day), vitamin D (5000 IU/day), resistance training 3x/week, and adequate protein. Weight-bearing exercise is critical for maintaining bone density during rapid weight loss.

41 11rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
PedsEndoPhilly
Member
345
1,890
Jun 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Sep 11, 2025 at 12:27 PM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Follow-up: I dropped the cardio to two easy sessions and put the effort into three real lifting sessions. The scale slowed and the scan improved.

40 10Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
raj_cambridge
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Cambridge, MA
Sep 12, 2025 at 5:38 AM#10
Dr.Martinez said:
Bone density monitoring on lean mass: DEXA bone density at baseline and month 12.

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

16 14RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register