DataDave said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
DataDave said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.PulmRoch said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.PulmRoch said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.