tommy_boulder said:Mostly the deficit, and the useful part of that answer is that it is testable.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Read the primary source rather than the write-up and the two do not agree, so here is what is actually in it.
Mostly the deficit, and the useful part of that answer is that it is testable. Fatigue driven by a deficit tracks intake, improves within a day or two of eating properly, and worsens on the days you eat least. Fatigue that is flat regardless of intake, or that arrives on a fixed day after dosing, is behaving like a drug effect. Before assuming either, rule out the boring causes — iron, B12, thyroid, and sleep — because a fast deficit unmasks deficiencies that were previously subclinical.
Where I think it is weakest: the comparator does most of the work in how this gets reported, and it is not the comparator most people think they are citing.
The narrow version of the question is whether the fatigue is a direct drug effect or simply the caloric deficit, because the answer changes what you do about it. Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.
tommy_boulder said:Mostly the deficit, and the useful part of that answer is that it is testable.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
tommy_boulder said:Mostly the deficit, and the useful part of that answer is that it is testable.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAnswering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
BariatricNurseD said:Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.