SleepDoc_PDX said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
SleepDoc_PDX said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemtammy_FL said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
tammy_FL said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.