Apr 6, 2026 at 9:24 PM#26
lisa_labSD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
2 0hyun_seoul, jim_asheville
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 7, 2026 at 10:02 AM#27
lisa_labSD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at lisa_labSD’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
3 1ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 7, 2026 at 10:40 PM#28
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Last edited: Apr 8, 2026 at 12:40 AM
4 2LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsApr 8, 2026 at 11:17 AM#29
One thing that is still open after lisa_labSD’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
5 3nick_SD_fit, ben_calgary, patPC_UT and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 8, 2026 at 11:54 PM#30
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
Last edited: Apr 9, 2026 at 4:54 AM
27 0jason_sac26, chris_chi24, tampaLisa73 and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report