One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Following on from roxy_nash — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
FDA_TrackerJim said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFDA_TrackerJim said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
FDA_TrackerJim said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.