claudia_zurich said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
claudia_zurich said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
raj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I read this differently from raj_cambridge, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
raj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsraj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.