Dr.ObesityLA said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Mine went the same way, slower.
Dr.ObesityLA said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Mine went the same way, slower.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
GenomicsKate said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsGenomicsKate said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Carry on.