MikeFit_NJ said:There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.
OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.
MikeFit_NJ said:There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.
OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.
One thing that is still open after Dr.SurgeonPGH’s answer:
Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?
DataDave said:lean mass + resistance training is the combo.
Coming at DataDave’s question from a different direction. Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale. It protects lean mass — which is the reason to do it — and it contributes modestly to the deficit, which is the reason people start and then quit when the arithmetic disappoints them. In a deep deficit, resistance work is the priority and high-volume cardio competes with recovery.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClosing the loop on my own question.
Second scan under matched conditions, six months apart, same time of day: the lean number came back nearly a kilo higher than the panic scan. Strength was up throughout.
Dr.ObesityLA said:Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale.
Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.