Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
What I actually want to know is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.
Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
TrialTracker_MD said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMikeKY_noInsulin said:Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
Mine went the same way, slower.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.