LipidDoc_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
LipidDoc_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
SteveThurs said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
LipidDoc_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Pushing back on LipidDoc_ATL here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.