josh_phd_bmore said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
josh_phd_bmore said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.EM_Chicago said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at Dr.EM_Chicago’s question from a different direction. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.