Dr.PeteFamMed said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
ingrid_STO said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.