Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
The question I want answered is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
Tell me what I have not thought of.
Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
LibrarianMeg said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsTomFromTexas said:Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.